War of Conquest

What kind of changes are you making to promote solo play? Currently, basically no one plays in a nation together anyway because multiple solo nations are much more powerful than a single co-op nation and you can still play as a team with solo nations. There's no competition for resources because the...

SkyHunter wrote: ↑

Fri Sep 28, 2018 8:26 pm

This gives a huge advantage to the legacy players with levelers.

In what way?

Increasing the manpower you start with would be an easy way to make the very start of the game more bearable. You start with 7200. What if it was increased to 15k? An extra 7800 manpower is very small in the long run but would make a difference at the start. New manpower resources might make Fresh S...

I thought it was only one nation that wiped him and not the whole team? Also, there is a visible boundary line between the newbie/veteran areas that mentions that veteran players cannot cross it. I'm not sure if that line only shows for veterans or not though. If it does and he didn't notice it he i...

Now you are blaming the victim. You sound like the Republicans in the Senate judiciary. This is also a red herring. How he got there is irrelevant. What the pinheads did to him is the point. He is the exact profile of the kind of player we want here. He had 2 nations in the midlands in less than 6 ...

The original point of manpower is to put a limit on how much a player can play each day, so that players who are able to be logged in for many hours each day don't have an overwhelming advantage over those players who have less free time to play. Making it regenerate a lot faster, or be easier to b...

I'd be ok with credit purchases being disabled. External factors like money should never influence how well anyone performs in a game, especially in one that is 100% PvP like this. As far as additional monetization, go the route of cosmetics because everyone likes cosmetics. Here's a few non-credit ...

It is a red herring fallacy because it distracts from, instead of addressing the point. I.E., that 40% of the negative reviews cite the toxic community as their reason for quitting the game and leaving a bad review. You are trying to defend the toxic community with a fallacy of informal logic. I'm ...

How is it a red herring fallacy? Your topic title is Early Steam Reviews and many of said reviews are about the game being pay to win. I think bringing it up is relevant to the topic. In fact, there are more negative reviews that mention pay to win than what other players are doing to them. A game b...

Most of the negative reviews I've seen are about the game being pay to win.